
Credit: Andresrphotos on Photodune
It's not unusual for a client to put a clause in your contract that, if there's an issue, they want to go to mediation, rather than court. Whether or not mediation is a good thing for you, as a freelancer, isn't a simple yes or no question.
Why Mediation is On the Table
Especially if you're dealing with a larger company as a client, mediation is popular because it's theoretically faster and cheaper than going to court. If you're based in one state, and your client is somewhere else, just figuring out which jurisdiction to file in can be incredibly complicated. Mediation can take place wherever the parties involved agree on, and there's a little more flexibility about being in the actual room where the mediator is sitting.
It's worth noting that mediation and arbitration are two different situations. In both cases, there's a third party involved, but the exact function of that person is very different. A mediator works to help the two parties involved in the dispute come to an agreement, but that agreement is not binding. In contrast, an arbiter hears both sides of the situation and makes a decision, like a judge might. That decision is usually binding.
Because mediation isn't binding, you may find that it is not always possible to get an equitable agreement out of mediation, especially if you and your client have very different understandings of the situation. Mediation does not rule out a law suit and can simply lead up to one.
Why Freelancers Should Keep Mediation in Mind
Despite the drawbacks of mediation, it's still a useful option for freelancers. It can be significantly less expensive to use mediation than to try to take a client to court. While you will likely need some legal advice in order to pursue mediation, you're looking at hundreds of dollars, rather than the thousands of dollars that it often takes to sue someone — which, in turn, puts litigation out of reach of many freelancers trying to collect unpaid invoices.
Mediation is less costly in terms of time, as well as money. If you're looking at a big case, you could wind up working with a lawyer for months or years to get it resolved. The number of delaying tactics available when a problem goes to court are huge. In contrast, mediation may take a matter of weeks from the time you decide to start the process to reach an agreement.
When Mediation is the Most Useful
There are times when mediation just won't help: if you're facing a problem with a client or a vendor who is not acting in good faith, going through mediation is not likely to result in an agreement that actually helps you out. Even if you do come to some sort of agreement, it's non-binding, which means that the individual or organization you're up against can simply ignore it.
But, provided that both parties are acting in good faith and just want to get the matter resolved, mediation can prove a much simpler approach than taking things to court. Mediation proves most useful in situations when there's an issue of interpretation (like just what a specific clause in a contract really means) rather than when the issue is that someone is simply refusing to carry through on the contract at all.
Photo credit: Some rights reserved by Andresrphotos.